Tourism for All! How modernity has killed journey

Tourism has nothing to do with his roots. When he was born in the eighteenth century, it was the personal experience of a man of "condition", a journey during which he had to confront his honor - that is to say the small number of principles which were inculcated - to worlds that were not his. It was just to see if these principles would resist if they were universal. One way to achieve manhood, in fact. The journey was then the risk, accidents, encounters,
Where the trip was a need, in the eighteenth, to become a man, train, complete soul and intelligence, it becomes something in the nineteenth statutory and simple way to "break" today.
considerations, as many modalities of an expected, hoped shock between the spectacle of the world and how the individual had designed this world inside of its original culture. In the nineteenth, everything changes: the bourgeois wants to hang on to the aristocrat of the eighteenth through the journey, which then becomes a form of statutory mimicry. The bourgeois nineteenth century travel can say "I was there." This is what was told to Flaubert when traveling with Maxime Du Camp in Egypt, but what am I doing here? - That is to say, what do I do to take me to an aristocrat of the eighteenth century-? With modern times, there is a total breakdown of tourism with its intellectual roots. Even among those who now want to reconnect with the trip, to oppose the mass tourism, there are more profound resonance, deep need, because the world has known, and the development of person goes necessarily through travel. Where the trip was a need, in the eighteenth, to become a man, train, complete soul and intelligence, it becomes something in the nineteenth statutory and simple way to "break" today. It has become a form of permanent party, which has become commonplace. The world is boring because it is the receptacle of the party, become commonplace. Solution: we must "rebanaliser" the world and de-normalize the party.